[Comparison of contrast-enhanced low mechanical index (Low MI) sonography and unenhanced B-mode sonography for the differentiation between synovitis and joint effusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis]. / Vergleich von kontrastmittelunterstützter Low-Mechanical-Index(Low-MI)-Sonographie und nativer B-Mode-Sonographie bei der Differenzierung von Synovitis und Gelenkerguss bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis.

PURPOSE: To test whether contrast-enhanced low mechanical index (low MI) sonography is superior to non enhanced B-Mode sonography in differentiating synovitis and joint effusion. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, 22 patients with proven rheumatoid arthritis underwent B-Mode sonography and low-MI sonography of 25 symptomatic joints of the upper and lower limbs. For low-MI sonography, 5 ml Sonovue (Bracco Altana Pharma GmbH, Konstanz) were injected as an intravenous bolus followed by 10 ml of 0.9 % saline solution. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was obtained additionally in 3 joints. With non-enhanced sonography, we diagnosed a synovitis in case of an echogenic and a joint effusion in case of an anechoic mass. With contrast-enhanced sonography, we diagnosed a synovitis in case of enhancement and a joint effusion in the absence of enhancement of the intraarticular mass. RESULTS: In 13 joints, synovitis and joint effusion were differentiated by both non-enhanced and enhanced sonography. In 12 joints, this differentiation was only possible with contrast-enhanced sonography. In 3 patients diagnosed by sonography as having a synovitis, this diagnosis was proven by MRI. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced low-MI sonography is superior to non-enhanced B-Mode sonography in differentiating synovitis and joint effusion.

Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CT.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to establish the most suitable algorithm to compare coronary artery calcium measurements performed with electron beam CT and multirow detector CT for the assessment of coronary artery disease. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Coronary artery screening was performed in 100 patients with both electron beam and multirow detector CT. The images were transferred to a dedicated workstation for determination of the calcium score, volume, mass, density, and number of lesions. In addition to the traditional threshold of 130 H, the score of multirow detector CT studies was reevaluated at a threshold of 90 H. Fifty-nine of the patients underwent conventional coronary catheterization. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the different scoring algorithms for detection of significant coronary artery stenosis was performed. RESULTS: The correlation between electron beam CT and multirow detector CT was high for every quantification algorithm. Determination of the score and the number of lesions with multirow detector CT revealed a systematic error of the measurement compared with electron beam CT. The areas under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for electron beam and multirow detector CT were similar for the score, volume, and mass, whereas they were lower for the density. No significant difference was found for the areas under the curve between scores using a 130-H and those using a 90-H threshold. CONCLUSION: Volume and mass indexes are superior to the traditional score, density, and number of lesions for comparing the results of electron beam and multirow detector CT and for determining significant coronary artery disease.